PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 11, 2026Geofluids0 citationsOpen Access

An Adaptive Response Surface Methodology for Determining Coal Pillar Width in Geologically Variable Longwall Panels

View Full Paper
SYSen YangXi'an University of Science and TechnologyZHZhe HeXi'an University of Science and TechnologyYXYang XuXi'an University of Science and Technology

Key Points

  • This study aims to develop a responsive design framework to determine optimal coal pillar width under geological variability.
  • Integrates response surface methodology (RSM) and numerical simulation.
  • Uses Box–Behnken experimental design and FLAC 3D simulations for modeling.
  • Field validation executed under geological transitions with various seam thicknesses and dips.
  • Widening pillars from 6 to 8 m reduced average roof deformation by approximately 50%.
  • Pillar width significantly influenced both roadway deformation and stress concentration with R² > 0.94.
  • Interaction effects identified: increased mining height and burial depth amplify roof displacement.

Abstract

Simulation‐based approaches are increasingly vital for addressing complex design challenges in underground coal mining, a domain where longwall pillar design is critically challenged by geological variability, and conventional methods lack adaptive capacity. This study develops a responsive design framework integrating response surface methodology (RSM) and numerical simulation to determine optimal pillar width under variable burial depth, dip angle, and mining height. Based on a Box–Behnken experimental design and FLAC 3D simulations, quadratic models were established for roadway deformation and pillar stress concentration, showing excellent fit ( R 2 > 0.94). Pillar width is the most influential factor for both responses. Significant interaction effects were identified: widening pillars reduces depth‐induced deformation but may cause stress concentration in deep zones; a threshold width of approximately 7–8 m exists, beyond which increasing mining height promotes stress dissipation; and simultaneous increases in mining height and burial depth synergistically amplify roof displacement. Field validation under challenging geological transitions (seam thickness: 7–15 m; dip: 18°–0°) confirmed the model’s reliability. Adjusting pillar width from 6 to 8 m reduced average roof deformation by approximately 50% while keeping stress concentration within safe limits. The proposed RSM‐based approach provides a computationally efficient and practically adaptable alternative to conventional pillar design in geologically variable panels.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a01726d3a9f334c282729fahttps://doi.org/10.1155/gfl/5775504
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Control Mechanism of the Coal Pillar Width on the Mechanical State of Hard Roofs2025
  2. 2Stability control of roadway surrounding rock with narrow barrier pillar in orthogonal mining layouts: numerical and field investigations2025
  3. 3Sensitivity Analysis of Coal-Pillar Loading and Roadway Floor Heave in High-Intensity Longwall Mining: Implications for Pressure-Relief Design2026
  4. 4Structural Design Method for Narrow Coal Pillars in Gateway Protection: Framework and Field Case Study2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Design of fault water-resisting coal pillars based on deep-beam analysis: A comparison of two analytical methods2026