Technical note describes outcomes of a new scarless thyroid surgery approach, indicating promising early results.
AIM: Transoral robotic thyroidectomy has emerged as a scarless alternative to conventional and remote-access approaches; however, technical standardization and outcome data for truly scarless three-port configurations remain limited. The aim of this study was to describe the surgical technique and early clinical outcomes of three-port transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) as a truly scarless remote-access approach to the thyroid gland. METHODS: This technical note reports a consecutive series of 25 patients who underwent three-port transoral robotic thyroidectomy between June 2017 and May 2019 at Korea University Hospital. Surgical steps, including vestibular port placement, working-space creation, robotic docking, and lobectomy procedures, are detailed. Perioperative data, postoperative outcomes, and complications were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The median age was 41.0 years, and 76.0% of patients were female. Unilateral thyroidectomy was performed in 80.0% of cases, and central neck dissection in 52.0%. The median operative time was 308.0 minutes, with minimal blood loss (3.0 mL). No intraoperative complications occurred. Transient hypoparathyroidism and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy were observed in 4.0% of patients each, while one permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (4.0%) was recorded. No cases of mental nerve injury or surgical site infection were observed. Postoperative pain was low, and the median hospital stay was 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: Three-port transoral robotic thyroidectomy is a feasible and safe technique in carefully selected patients when performed in experienced centers. Despite a prolonged operative time during the initial learning phase, complication rates were acceptable and cosmetic outcomes were excellent. This approach should currently be reserved for high-volume endocrine robotic units under strict indication criteria and structured training pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brucchi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: