PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 11, 2026Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering2 citationsOpen Access

State-of-the-art Machine Learning Advances in Reliability-based Design, Integrity Assessment, Inspection and Maintenance of Pipelines: A Systematic Review

View Full Paper
ASArdeshir SavariYLY LiKAKhaled Alnefaie

Key Points

  • This review aims to explore the applications of machine learning in pipeline engineering, focusing on reliability and integrity assessment.
  • Systematic examination of existing literature on machine learning in pipeline engineering applications.
  • Analysis of traditional and emerging ML techniques in design, condition monitoring, and inspection.
  • Identification of key challenges and research frontiers in the integration of ML with pipeline integrity management.
  • Identified a shift towards hybrid and physics-informed machine learning techniques in pipeline engineering.
  • Highlighted limitations due to small datasets and lack of interpretable models, affecting generalization.
  • Defined three main research frontiers include developing benchmark datasets, interpretable learning frameworks, and standardized evaluation protocols.

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) has increasingly been adopted in pipeline engineering, extending traditional physics-based, statistical, and empirical diagnostics toward data-driven frameworks. This review systematically examines ML applications in reliability-based design, structural integrity evaluation, condition monitoring, and inspection planning of pipelines. The literature shows a shift from conventional case-specific supervised learning toward transferable, hybrid, metaheuristic, and physics-informed techniques. These frameworks decompose signals, quantify uncertainty, use graph-based knowledge representation, and enhance generalizability through physics-informed learning, ranging from theory-guided features and architectures to limited forms of constraint enforcement. However, progress is limited by small, low-quality laboratory datasets, little focus on fatigue crack growth and multi-defect interactions, and heavy reliance on opaque surrogate models. A comparative analysis reveals persistent bottlenecks in generalization, interpretability, and the coupling of material, environmental, and operational variables. Three main research frontiers emerge: (1) large-scale, multi-source benchmark datasets, (2) physics-informed and interpretable learning frameworks that bridge domain mechanics and ML algorithms, and (3) standardized evaluation protocols and field-level validation schemes. The review concludes with a research roadmap to accelerate the move from algorithm-centric experimentation to tractable, trustworthy ML frameworks for pipeline integrity management. Overall, this study provides guidance for improving pipeline integrity to support safe and sustainable energy transport through resilient infrastructures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Savari et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a01726d3a9f334c28272a5ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2026.100528
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper