Randomized trial assesses Proclarix’s performance in identifying prostate cancer risk in men, indicating its potential benefits.
PSA testing is widely used for the early detection of prostate cancer (PCa), but its low specificity leads to overdiagnosis and unnecessary interventions. Proclarix, a novel blood test combining serum levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA), percentage of free PSA (%fPSA), Cathepsin D (CTSD) and Thrombospondin 1 (THBS1) with age into a risk score, aims to improve risk stratification by predicting clinically significant PCa (csPCa). This study evaluated its diagnostic performance in a Danish population using retrospective serum samples collected consecutively from patients with suspected PCa. Proclarix’ ability to reduce biopsies and detection of clinically insignificant PCa (ciPCa, defined as Grade Group < 2) was assessed in men with a PSA 2–10 ng/ml and a prostate volume of ≥ 35 ml (targeted population) compared with the percentage of free PSA (%fPSA) and the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator (ERSPC-RC). The secondary analysis included the performance of Proclarix’ and Proclarix density compared with the %fPSA and PSA density (PSA-D) in a broader population with a PSA 2–20 ng/ml regardless of both prostate volume and DRE (extended population). Proclarix score is considered negative when it’s below the cutoff 10%. In the targeted population (n = 373), a negative Proclarix test significantly reduced the probability of csPCa from 27% (pretest) to 5% (posttest, 95%CI: 0–10%), (p < 0.028) outperforming %fPSA (posttest 14%, 95%CI: 4–24%) and ERSPC-RC (posttest 20%, 95%CI: 4–36%). For the diagnosis of csPCa, Proclarix had a significantly (p < 0.01) greater specificity of 22% (95%CI: 17–27%) at 97% sensitivity (95%CI: 94–100%) and 95% NPV (95%CI: 90–100%) than did %fPSA and the ERSPC-RC, with 14% (95%CI: 10–18%) and 7% (95%CI: 4–11%) specificity, respectively. In the extended population (n = 656), Proclarix density had significantly (p < 0.01) greater specificity (39%, 95%CI: 35–44%) than did PSA-D (32%, 95%CI: 27–36%) at an equal sensitivity of 90%. Proclarix reduces prostate biopsies and ciPCa detection while maintaining a low risk of missing csPCa.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schiess et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: