particles/mL). The polarization profile was analyzed by the quantitative assessment of relative gene expression levels as well as by the determination of specific proteins by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Analysis by qRT-PCR revealed significantly elevated levels of pro-inflammatory markers such as TNF-α and CD197 at the highest concentration of stimulation by the microsized particles. This was confirmed on the protein level in the cytokine expression profile of TNF-α. Furthermore, no significant differences were found for the markers CCL22 and CD206, which are specific for the M2-like phenotype. In contrast, stimulation by nanoparticles did not induce macrophage polarization toward M1 or M2-like phenotype in any applied concentration. We conclude that the size of the particle is a determinant factor in driving the biological response of macrophages and an increased understanding of this relationship may potentially guide the design of new biomaterials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schoenenberger et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: