values of BxPC-3-GR and CFPAC-1-GR increased 112-fold and 210-fold, respectively, compared to parental cell lines. In vitro and in vivo experiments confirmed that both GEM-resistant cell subgroups declined in proliferative capacity, but were more resistant to GEM. Unlike CFPAC-1-GR, BxPC-3-GR exhibited enhanced migratory and invasive properties compared with BxPC-3 in vitro. We also compared differentially expressed mRNA profiles between parental and GEM-resistant cells using transcriptome sequencing. RRM1, STIM1, and TRIM21 were significantly upregulated in both GEM-resistant cell lines and confirmed to be associated with the degree of GEM resistance by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and western blot analysis. These three genes were more highly expressed in PC tissues and potentially regarded as prognostic biomarkers through database mining. Thus, our findings provide chemo-resistant cell models to better understand the underlying mechanisms of chemoresistance, and to explore potential biomarkers for GEM response in PC patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: