PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 11, 2000Circulation289 citationsOpen Access

Oral Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition With Orbofiban in Patients With Unstable Coronary Syndromes (OPUS-TIMI 16) Trial

View Full Paper
CCChristopher P. CannonCMCarolyn H. McCabeRWRobert G. Wilcox

Key Points

  • This research investigates the effects of oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor orbofiban on cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
  • Randomized trial with 10,288 patients from 888 hospitals across 29 countries.

Structured PICO

Does oral orbofiban reduce the composite of death, myocardial infarction, recurrent ischemia requiring rehospitalization, urgent revascularization, or stroke in patients with acute coronary syndromes?

P
Population
10,288 patients with acute coronary syndromes (defined as ischemic pain at rest within 72 hours of randomization, associated with positive cardiac markers, electrocardiographic changes, or prior cardiovascular disease), multinational (29 countries).
I
Intervention
Orbofiban 50 mg oral twice daily (50/50 group) OR orbofiban 50 mg twice daily for 30 days followed by 30 mg twice daily (50/30 group), added to aspirin.
C
Comparator
Placebo added to aspirin.
O
Outcome
Composite of death, myocardial infarction, recurrent ischemia requiring rehospitalization, urgent revascularization, or stroke.composite

Fixed-dose oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with orbofiban failed to reduce major cardiovascular events and was associated with increased mortality and bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are beneficial in patients with acute coronary syndromes, prolonged oral IIb/IIIa inhibition might provide an additional reduction in recurrent events. METHODS AND RESULTS: Investigators at 888 hospitals in 29 countries enrolled 10 288 patients with acute coronary syndromes, which was defined as ischemic pain at rest within 72 hours of randomization, associated with positive cardiac markers, electrocardiographic changes, or prior cardiovascular disease. Patients received aspirin and were randomized to receive, for the duration of the trial, (1) 50 mg of orbofiban twice daily (50/50 group), (2) 50 mg of orbofiban twice daily for 30 days followed by 30 mg of orbofiban twice daily (50/30 group), or (3) a placebo. The primary composite end point was death, myocardial infarction, recurrent ischemia requiring rehospitalization, urgent revascularization, or stroke. The trial was terminated prematurely because of an unexpected increase in 30-day mortality in the 50/30 orbofiban group. Mortality through 10 months was 3.7% for the placebo group versus 5.1% in the 50/30 group (P=0.008) and 4.5% in the 50/50 group (P=0.11). There were no differences in the primary end point (22.9%, 23.1%, and 22.8%, for the placebo, 50/30, and 50/50 groups, respectively). Major or severe bleeding (but not intracranial hemorrhage) was higher with orbofiban; it occurred in 2. 0%, 3.7% (P=0.0004), and 4.5% (P<0.0001) of patients, respectively. Exploratory subgroup analyses found that patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention had a lower mortality and a significant reduction in the composite end point (P=0.001) with orbofiban. CONCLUSIONS: -Fixed-dose orbofiban failed to reduce major cardiovascular events and was associated with increased mortality in this broad population of patients with acute coronary syndromes; however, a benefit was observed among patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cannon et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a01b8cef58f6e6cfdd8bb59https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.2.149
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper