PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 12, 2012New England Journal of Medicine642 citationsOpen Access

Phenotypic Heterogeneity of Genomic Disorders and Rare Copy-Number Variants

View Full Paper
SGSanthosh GirirajanJRJill A. RosenfeldBCBradley P. Coe

Key Points

  • To determine the genetic causes underlying extreme phenotypic heterogeneity in individuals carrying copy-number variants associated with developmental disorders.
  • Analyzed the genomes of 2312 children carrying a copy-number variant linked to intellectual disability and congenital abnormalities.
  • Assessed genetic profiles using array comparative genomic hybridization to evaluate variant load, inheritance patterns, and clinical severity.
  • A second large copy-number variant was present in 10.1% of affected children, and carrying two large variants of unknown significance increased developmental delay risk (OR, 8.16; 95% CI, 5.33 to 13.07; P=2.11×10⁻³⁸).
  • Inherited copy-number variants significantly co-occurred with a second-site large variant (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.66; P<0.001).
  • Phenotypic heterogeneity disorders were more prevalent in boys (P<0.001), and secondary variants were preferentially transmitted from mothers (P=0.02).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some copy-number variants are associated with genomic disorders with extreme phenotypic heterogeneity. The cause of this variation is unknown, which presents challenges in genetic diagnosis, counseling, and management. METHODS: We analyzed the genomes of 2312 children known to carry a copy-number variant associated with intellectual disability and congenital abnormalities, using array comparative genomic hybridization. RESULTS: Among the affected children, 10.1% carried a second large copy-number variant in addition to the primary genetic lesion. We identified seven genomic disorders, each defined by a specific copy-number variant, in which the affected children were more likely to carry multiple copy-number variants than were controls. We found that syndromic disorders could be distinguished from those with extreme phenotypic heterogeneity on the basis of the total number of copy-number variants and whether the variants are inherited or de novo. Children who carried two large copy-number variants of unknown clinical significance were eight times as likely to have developmental delay as were controls (odds ratio, 8.16; 95% confidence interval, 5.33 to 13.07; P=2.11×10(-38)). Among affected children, inherited copy-number variants tended to co-occur with a second-site large copy-number variant (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.66; P<0.001). Boys were more likely than girls to have disorders of phenotypic heterogeneity (P<0.001), and mothers were more likely than fathers to transmit second-site copy-number variants to their offspring (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple, large copy-number variants, including those of unknown pathogenic significance, compound to result in a severe clinical presentation, and secondary copy-number variants are preferentially transmitted from maternal carriers. (Funded by the Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative and the National Institutes of Health.).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Girirajan et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a01c3c61487eb4b96caef85https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1200395
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper