Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore a number of tensions arising in the presentation of autoethnographical research. Design/methodology/approach The paper provides a reflexive autoethnographical account of undertaking and publically presenting autoethnographical research. Findings The paper problematises the extent and form of disclosure; the voice and representation of the researcher; the difficulties in dealing with sensitive subjects; conflicts between public and private domains; questions of validity; the extent and form of theorisation of autoethnographical narratives; and emotion and performativity in presenting autoethnographical research. Originality/value The paper provides an analysis of the potential of autoethnography, while exploring the presentational and performative context of academia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kathryn Haynes (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: