Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIM: To evaluate the cytotoxicity and mineralization effects of iRoot BP in human dental pulp cells (hDPCs) and to compare them with those of white mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA). METHODOLOGY: hDPCs were exposed to prepared dilutions (1 : 1-1 : 10) of the test materials. Cell viability was evaluated using the XTT assay after incubation periods of 24, 48 or 72 h. The expression of mineralization-related genes (bone morphogenic protein, osteonectin, bone sialoprotein, osteopontin, dentine sialophosphoprotein and collagen type 1) and heme oxygenase 1 was measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) at 24 and 72 h. Statistical differences between test materials were analysed with the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: The 1 : 1 and 1 : 2 dilutions of iRoot BP were associated with higher cell viability after 24 h (P < 0.05). Only the 1 : 1 dilution of iRoot BP had higher cell viability after 48 h (P < 0.05), and there was no difference between iRoot BP and WMTA after 72 h (P > 0.05). Although somewhat variable, according to the gene expression results, iRoot BP had a mineralization potential similar to that of WMTA. WMTA revealed a higher heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) mRNA level than iRoot BP (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: iRoot BP and WMTA were biocompatible and facilitated odontoblastic differentiation of hDPCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Torun et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: