Does brand sponsorship of sporting events lead to more congruence in consumers' images of sponsoring brands and sponsored sporting events? If so, what factors affect the extent of increase in image congruence? Results of a study with three sporting events (replicate stimuli) and nonstudent participants confirm Gwinner and Eaton's (1999 ———, and John Eaton (1999), “Building Brand Image through Event Sponsorship: The Role of Image Transfer,” Journal of Advertising, 28 (4), 47–57.[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) finding that brand sponsorship increases image congruence. Further, there is a greater increase in image congruence when functional similarity between sponsoring brands and sponsored events is high (versus low). But contrary to Gwinner and Eaton (1999 ———, and John Eaton (1999), “Building Brand Image through Event Sponsorship: The Role of Image Transfer,” Journal of Advertising, 28 (4), 47–57.[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), the present findings do not indicate that the increase in image congruence is moderated by high (versus low) image-based similarity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwon et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: