Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a critical view of the use of geodata/capta from social media sources as a research tool in geographic research. It compares three captasets from Instagram, Flickr, and Twitter, based upon spatial and descriptive statistics. Observed discrepancies in the different distribution of values are found to be related to differences in the spatial practices of their users and the modes of production of the ambient geosocial information. The results indicate that the interpretation of geosocial media capta must consider underlying social processes, but such linkages are currently poorly understood. Therefore, caution should be exercised when aggregating capta from more than one social media platform. Geotagged content can represent various interactions and intentions of its creators. At the same time, the observed differences can give more insights into relationships between material space and the production of digital realities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michał Rzeszewski (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: