Why the study?
Intraoperative hypotension increases morbidity and mortality after major abdominal surgery despite goal-directed hemodynamic therapy, raising the question of whether an HPI-based protocol reduces hypotension severity and duration.
Does an HPI-based protocol reduce intraoperative hypotension compared with a GDHT protocol in adult patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery?
Does an HPI-based protocol reduce intraoperative hypotension compared with a GDHT protocol in adult patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery?
An HPI-based protocol significantly reduces intraoperative hypotension compared to standard GDHT during major abdominal surgery, though without differences in tissue oxygenation or acute kidney injury risk.
HPI protocol reduces intraoperative hypotension versus GDHT in major abdominal surgery; extends predictive analytics evidence without oxygenation or AKI benefit.
Background Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality after major abdominal surgery but remains significant even when using goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) protocols. The Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) is a machine learning-derived parameter that predicts arterial hypotension. We tested the hypothesis that an HPI-based protocol reduces the duration and severity of hypotension compared with a GDHT protocol during major abdominal surgery. Methods This is a parallel-arm double-blinded multicenter randomized trial involving adult patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery at five centers. Patients were optimized according to a previously recommended GDHT protocol (GDHT group) or the HPI value (HPI group). Hemodynamic optimization in both groups started 15 min after the surgical incision. The primary outcome was the intraoperative time-weighted average of mean arterial pressure under 65 mmHg (TWA-MAP < 65 mmHg). Other metrics for IOH and secondary outcomes, including TWA below individual baseline values of intraoperative tissue oxygenation (StO 2 ), postoperative AKIRisk, postoperative complications, length of stay, and 30-day mortality, were explored. Results Eighty patients were randomized (40 patients in each group). TWA-MAP < 65 mmHg was 0.06 (25th–75th interquartile range: 0–0.27) mmHg in the GDTH group vs. 0 (0–0.04) mmHg in the HPI group ( p = 0.015). Total time with MAP < 65 mmHg per patient was 4.6 (0–21) min in the GDHT group and 0 (0–3) min in the HPI group ( p = 0.008). The TWA below the baseline StO 2 was 0.40% (0.12%–2.41%) in the GDHT group and 0.95% (0.15%–3.20%) in the HPI group ( p = 0.353). The AKIRisk values obtained in the GDHT group were 0.30 (0.14–0.53) and 0.34 (0.15–0.67) in the GDHT and HPI groups ( p = 0.731), respectively. Both groups had similar postoperative complications, length of stay, and 30-day mortality. Conclusions An HPI-based protocol reduced intraoperative hypotension compared with a standard GDHT protocol, with no differences in tissue oxygenation and postoperative AKIRisk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lorente et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: