Yttrium oxide and gadolinium oxide modified platinum nanoparticles supported on carbon (Vulcan XC‐72), noted as Pt–M 2 O 3 /C (M=Y and Gd), were synthesized by water‐in‐oil nanoemulsion chemical route, followed by heat treatment at 100 and 300 °C under hydrogen/nitrogen (H 2 /N 2 ) atmosphere and tested as electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). As revealed by powder X‐ray diffraction analysis, all obtained catalysts showed solely Pt face‐centered‐cubic structure, and absence of a secondary phase before and after heat treatments, indicating that Y 2 O 3 and Gd 2 O 3 are highly disordered (amorphous) and dispersed clusters. The surface Pt:M ratio (M=Y and Gd), as revealed by X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy, increased after heat treatment with respect to the value of as‐prepared samples, for which the ratio was 1:1. Microstrain data extracted from Williamson–Hall plots for Pt–M 2 O 3 /C (M=Y and Gd) catalysts surprisingly increased after heat treatment at 100 °C, remaining nearly constant after heat treatment at 300 °C, whereas the value of pure Pt nanoparticles, noted as Pt/C, decreased after heat treatments. The mean particle size derived from TEM images for Pt–M 2 O 3 /C (M=Y and Gd) was almost unchanged after heat treatments, at variance with the Pt/C case where a clear increase is observed. Surface specific activity and mass activity towards ORR obtained with as‐prepared Pt–M 2 O 3 /C (M=Y and Gd) catalysts were higher than those of as‐prepared Pt/C catalyst. After heat treatment, the ORR activity of Pt–M 2 O 3 /C (M=Y and Gd) augmented, whereas that of Pt/C diminished. Moreover, after 6000 cycles between 0.5 and 0.95 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (vs. RHE), Pt–M 2 O 3 /C (M=Y and Gd) catalysts retained a large active surface area and a high kinetic current density at 0.9 V vs. RHE in comparison with Pt/C samples. These facts assess a positive effect of the interaction between M 2 O 3 (M=Y and Gd) and Pt catalytic centers both on the catalytic activity of the material towards ORR and on its durability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: