Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The trade-offs and supply-demand relations of ecosystem services (ES) are at the frontier of geographical and ecological studies. However, previous studies have focused on either trade-offs or the supply-demand aspects, while ES conflicts and supply/demand contradictions have not been comprehensively examined. The relationship between ES trade-offs and supply-demand is logically valid and studying the coupling of both can provide approaches for simultaneously alleviating ES conflicts and supply-demand contradictions. This study, based on a review of previous analyses of ES trade-offs and supply-demand dynamics, proposes a new analytic framework to couple them. First, we define two types of trade-offs based on the directions of growth or decline of the two services. We also define the supply-demand balance area and the supply-demand risk area according to the ES flow characteristics. Second, the mechanisms driving ES trade-offs are clarified, and land-use scenarios are set based on the mechanisms. Third, the supply-demand spatial characteristics of ES are analyzed, and supply-demand risk areas are identified. Finally, scenario iterations are performed to minimize the supply-demand risk area at an acceptable trade-off intensity to identify an optimal land use plan, which simultaneously alleviates ES conflicts and supply-demand contradictions. This analytic framework offers new opportunities for improving sustainable ecosystem management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: