PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2012BMC Veterinary Research170 citationsOpen Access

Longitudinal study on morbidity and mortality in white veal calves in Belgium

BPBart PardonUniversity College GhentKBKoen De BleeckerRode Kruis-VlaanderenMHMiel HostensUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mortality and morbidity are hardly documented in the white veal industry, despite high levels of antimicrobial drug use and resistance. The objective of the present study was to determine the causes and epidemiology of morbidity and mortality in dairy, beef and crossbred white veal production. A total of 5853 calves, housed in 15 production cohorts, were followed during one production cycle. Causes of mortality were determined by necropsy. Morbidity was daily recorded by the producers. RESULTS: The total mortality risk was 5,3% and was significantly higher in beef veal production compared to dairy or crossbreds. The main causes of mortality were pneumonia (1.3% of the calves at risk), ruminal disorders (0.7%), idiopathic peritonitis (0.5%), enterotoxaemia (0.5%) and enteritis (0.4%). Belgian Blue beef calves were more likely to die from pneumonia, enterotoxaemia and arthritis. Detection of bovine viral diarrhea virus at necropsy was associated with chronic pneumonia and pleuritis. Of the calves, 25.4% was treated individually and the morbidity rate was 1.66 cases per 1000 calf days at risk. The incidence rate of respiratory disease, diarrhea, arthritis and otitis was 0.95, 0.30, 0.11 and 0.07 cases per 1000 calf days at risk respectively. Morbidity peaked in the first three weeks after arrival and gradually declined towards the end of the production cycle. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provided insights into the causes and epidemiology of morbidity and mortality in white veal calves in Belgium, housed in the most frequent housing system in Europe. The necropsy findings, identified risk periods and differences between production systems can guide both veterinarians and producers towards the most profitable and ethical preventive and therapeutic protocols.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pardon et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a01f14d1adb974501cb025ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-26
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Influence of breed, heterozygosity, and disease incidence on estimates of variance components of respiratory disease in preweaned beef calves2005 · 115 citations
  2. 2Multidisciplinary approach to evaluating welfare of veal calves in commercial facilities1994 · 50 citations
  3. 3Bacterial intestinal flora associated with enterotoxaemia in Belgian Blue calves2001 · 72 citations
  4. 4Effect of Passive Transfer Status and Vaccination with Escherichia coli (J5) on Mortality in Comingled Dairy Calves1999 · 13 citations
  5. 5Risk factors for high herd level calf morbidity risk from birth to weaning in beef herds in the USA2000 · 32 citations