Others have suggested that developmentally delayed children, who are frequently esotropic, have a poor prognosis following esotropia surgery. To date, no comparison of success rates in normal and delayed children following similar surgery has been made. We compared our long-term results following graded bilateral medial rectus recessions in consecutive normal (n = 62) and delayed (n = 29) children. We defined success as alignment maintained within 10 delta of orthophoria. Survival curves were compared using the Mantel-Haenszel statistic. Delayed children had a significantly poorer outcome (p = .05) throughout follow up, which ranged from 12 to 120 months (mean = 24 months). Early in the period of study, we observed a large proportion of overcorrections among the delayed children. Subsequent modification in the amount of surgery performed appeared to improve the initial and long-term success in these children. We conclude that delayed children do have a poorer prognosis than normal children following medial rectus recession. This prognosis may be improved by more conservative amounts of surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pickering et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: