This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Iron overload is one of the secondary osteoporosis etiologies. Cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in iron-related osteoporosis are not fully understood. AIM: The aim of the study was to investigate the respective roles of iron excess and hepcidin, the systemic iron regulator, in the development of iron-related osteoporosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: ) and secondary iron overload (SIO) exhibiting a hepcidin increase secondary to iron excess. Iron concentration and transferrin saturation levels were evaluated in serum and hepatic, spleen, and bone iron concentrations were assessed by ICP-MS and Perl's staining. Gene expression was evaluated by quantitative RT-PCR. Bone micro-architecture was evaluated by micro-CT. The osteoblastic MC3T3 murine cells that are able to mineralize were exposed to iron and/or hepcidin. RESULTS: mice, while iron deposits were mainly visible in bone marrow macrophages in secondary iron overload. In cell cultures, ferric ammonium citrate exposure abolished the mineralization process for concentrations above 5 μM, with a parallel decrease in osteocalcin, collagen 1, and alkaline phosphatase mRNA levels. Hepcidin supplementation of cells had a rescue effect on the collagen 1 and alkaline phosphatase expression level decrease. CONCLUSION: Together, these data suggest that iron in excess alone is not sufficient to induce osteoporosis and that low hepcidin levels also contribute to the development of osteoporosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robin et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: