Evidence-based guidelines recommend specific imaging modalities, including echocardiography, MRI, CT, and PET, for the initial evaluation, characterization, and follow-up of adult cardiac masses.
What are the appropriate imaging modalities for the initial evaluation, characterization, and follow-up of cardiac masses in adults?
This document provides evidence-based guidelines on the appropriate use of multimodality imaging for the initial evaluation, characterization, and follow-up of cardiac masses in adults.
This document discusses the appropriateness of imaging modalities for cardiac masses under 3 variants: 1) adult with suspected cardiac mass, initial imaging; 2) adult with known cardiac mass in echocardiography of unknown etiology, next imaging; and 3) adult with known cardiac mass and established etiology, follow-up imaging. US echocardiography transthoracic resting, MRI heart function and morphology without and with contrast, and CT heart function and morphology with contrast are usually appropriate for Variant 1. US echocardiography transesophageal, US echocardiography transthoracic resting, MRI heart function and morphology without and with contrast, CT heart function and morphology with contrast, FDG-PET/CT heart, and FDG-PET/MRI heart are usually appropriate for Variant 2. US echocardiography transthoracic resting, MRI heart function and morphology without and with contrast, MRI heart function and morphology without contrast, CT heart function and morphology with contrast, and FDG-PET/MRI heart are usually appropriate for Variant 3. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Rajiah et al. (2026) conducted a review in Cardiac masses. Imaging modalities (Echocardiography, MRI, CT, PET) was evaluated on Appropriateness of imaging modalities. Evidence-based guidelines recommend specific imaging modalities, including echocardiography, MRI, CT, and PET, for the initial evaluation, characterization, and follow-up of adult cardiac masses.