Surgical treatment of preoperative atrial fibrillation during cardiac surgery showed an increase in isolated LAAO from 14.7% to 30.1%, while any surgical ablation remained stagnant at around 45%.
Observational (n=1,242,607)
Yes
What are the temporal trends and variability in the use of concomitant surgical ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion for patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation undergoing primary cardiac surgery?
Despite class I guideline recommendations, surgical treatment of preoperative atrial fibrillation during cardiac surgery remains highly variable and underutilized in the U.S., though isolated LAAO rates are increasing.
BACKGROUND The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) 2023 Guidelines for the Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) established concomitant surgical ablation (SA) and left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) as class I recommendations. This study uses the STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (STS-ACSD) to quantify trends in adherence. METHODS Patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic valve surgery (AVRr), and/or mitral valve surgery (MVRr) from July 2017 through December 2023 were analyzed. Data were analyzed for frequency trends for SA and LAAO in all patients with preoperative AF and stratified by surgical sub-cohorts (isolated CABG, AVRr±CABG, or MVRr±CABG). Variability in rates of SA and LAAO was also analyzed by patient characteristics, surgeon, program, and geographic region. RESULTS The study included 1,242,607 patients, of whom 11.8% had preoperative AF. During the study period, the rate of no AF treatment decreased from 42.4% to 24.8%, while the rate of isolated LAAO increased from 14.7% to 30.1%. The rate of any SA remained stagnant at around 45%. Patients with medical comorbidities and those undergoing non-elective surgery, isolated CABG, or surgery in the Mid-Atlantic region were less likely to receive surgical AF treatment, especially SA. AF treatment by surgeon was highly variable, and program volume of cases with preoperative AF was correlated with rate of surgical treatment for AF. CONCLUSIONS Despite increasing application of surgical treatment of preoperative AF in the U.S., variability and undertreatment persist. Concerted efforts at education, monitoring adoption, and the potential establishment of quality metrics should be considered.
Hodges et al. (Sun,) conducted a observational in Preoperative Atrial Fibrillation (n=1,242,607). Surgical ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion vs. No AF treatment was evaluated on Frequency trends for surgical ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion. Surgical treatment of preoperative atrial fibrillation during cardiac surgery showed an increase in isolated LAAO from 14.7% to 30.1%, while any surgical ablation remained stagnant at around 45%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: