Key result
AI-CVD-HF model is linked to better calibration for predicting heart failure than PREVENT-HF.
Why the study?
Does the AI-CVD-HF model improve heart failure prediction compared to PREVENT-HF in asymptomatic individuals?
Observational (n=6,743)
Yes
Does the AI-CVD-HF model improve heart failure prediction compared to PREVENT-HF in asymptomatic individuals?
An AI-derived heart failure prediction model using non-contrast CAC scans demonstrated better discrimination and calibration than PREVENT-HF in asymptomatic individuals.
Background: The AI-CVD initiative seeks to extract actionable information from coronary artery calcium (CAC) scans beyond the CAC score. We aimed to develop a heart failure (HF) prediction model, AI-CVD-HF, based on AI-derived features from non-contrast CAC scans, and compare it with PREVENT-HF. Method: AI features from CAC scans of 6743 asymptomatic participants in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and Framingham Heart Study-Offspring (FHS-O) (mean age 62.3 ± 10.1; 47.2% male; median follow-up 17.1 years; 429 HF events) were analyzed. Features were selected using random forest and modeled with random survival forest. Performance was assessed against the base PREVENT-HF using 5-fold cross-validation for area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), net-benefit, and calibration. External validation experiment was conducted to assess generalizability. Results: = 0.049), and consistent performance across age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Calibration metrics favored AI-CVD-HF over PREVENT-HF (Brier score [0.0356 vs 0.0383], slope [1.02 vs 1.20]). External validation showed performance and calibration consistent with internal validation. Conclusions: AI-CVD-HF, using AI-derived features from CAC scans, demonstrated more favorable discrimination and calibration than PREVENT-HF for HF prediction, extending the utility of CAC scans beyond coronary artery disease risk assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mirjalili et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Heart failure risk (n=6,743). AI-CVD-HF model vs. PREVENT-HF model was evaluated on Heart failure prediction (discrimination and calibration) (p=0.049). The AI-CVD-HF model demonstrated more favorable calibration for heart failure prediction than PREVENT-HF (Brier score 0.0356 vs 0.0383; slope 1.02 vs 1.20; P=0.049).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: