PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 31, 2026The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging0 citations

A TMAD-based rapid assessment model for left ventricular systolic function in patients with coronary artery disease: a multicenter prospective development and validation study

View Full Paper
YWYi WangSun Yat-sen UniversityYLYanqiu LiuSun Yat-sen UniversityMYMin YeSun Yat-sen University

Key Result

Tissue Motion Annular Displacement (TMAD) demonstrated high diagnostic efficacy for identifying MACE (AUC 0.880, P<0.001) and reduced LV systolic function (AUC 0.903, P=0.008) in CAD patients.

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the prognostic value of TMAD and develop a stable model for rapid estimation of LVEF in CAD patients.
  • Multicenter prospective study involving CAD patients.
  • Characterization of LVEF and TMAD, calculated AUROCs for MACE prediction, and Cox modelling for risk assessment.
  • Developed a rapid LVEF evaluation method tested across validation sets.
  • TMAD demonstrated significant correlations with GLS (r=0.850, P<0.001) and LVEF (r=0.608, P<0.001).
  • High diagnostic efficacy for identifying MACE (AUC=0.880, P<0.001) and reduced LV systolic function (AUC=0.903, P=0.008).
  • TMAD was the only independent risk factor for MACE in the multivariate Cox model.

Study Design

Type

Cohort

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does Tissue Motion Annular Displacement (TMAD) accurately estimate left ventricular systolic function and predict MACE in patients with coronary artery disease?

P
Population
Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD)
I
Intervention
Tissue Motion Annular Displacement (TMAD) measurement
C
Comparator
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS)
O
Outcome
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and reduced LV systolic functionsurrogate

TMAD provides a rapid, reproducible, and image-quality-independent method for estimating LVEF and predicting MACE in patients with coronary artery disease.

Main Result

Effect estimate: AUC 0.880 (MACE), AUC 0.903 (reduced LV function)

p-value: p=<0.001 (MACE), 0.008 (reduced LV function)

Abstract

Assessing left ventricular (LV) systolic function is critical for diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Current methods like LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) are time-consuming and image-quality-dependent. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of Tissue Motion Annular Displacement (TMAD) in patients with CAD and develop a stable, reproducible LVEF estimation model for rapid cardiac dysfunction screening. In this prospective, multicentre study we characterised LVEF and TMAD, calculated AUROCs to predict MACE and reduced systolic function, and performed Cox modelling for MACE risk. A rapid LVEF evaluation method was developed using the best-fit model and applied in CAD patients. TMAD, especially nTMADmid, showed significant correlations with GLS (r = 0.850, P < 0.001) and LVEF (r = 0.608, P < 0.001). Moreover, TMAD demonstrated high diagnostic efficacy for identifying MACE (AUC = 0.880, P<0.001) and reduced LV systolic function (AUC = 0.903, P = 0.008). The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that TMAD was the only independent risk factor for MACE. Power equations (highest F-value) were selected to build the model, showing minimal bias between observed and estimated LVEF across validation sets. Furthermore, TMAD exhibited high intra- and inter-observer reproducibility, was independent of view selection and image quality, and required significantly shorter time-consuming than both LVEF and GLS. TMAD is a valuable tool for assessing LV systolic function and providing incremental prognostic information. The TMAD-based predictive model enables rapid LVEF prediction and rapid detection of myocardial damage. Its simplicity and independence from image quality make it particularly useful in challenging imaging scenarios.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in coronary artery disease. Tissue Motion Annular Displacement (TMAD) vs. LVEF and GLS was evaluated on identifying MACE and reduced LV systolic function (AUC 0.880 (MACE), AUC 0.903 (reduced LV function), p=<0.001 (MACE), 0.008 (reduced LV function)). Tissue Motion Annular Displacement (TMAD) demonstrated high diagnostic efficacy for identifying MACE (AUC 0.880, P<0.001) and reduced LV systolic function (AUC 0.903, P=0.008) in CAD patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a025bf7edf6f481385941a7https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-026-03694-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper