Pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation resulted in significantly fewer AF triggers originating from the superior vena cava compared to thermal ablation (0.7% vs 4.7%; P=0.03).
Observational (n=358)
Does pulsed field ablation reduce the frequency of superior vena cava-related atrial fibrillation triggers compared to thermal ablation in patients undergoing first-time pulmonary vein isolation?
Pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation is associated with unintended but potentially beneficial conduction changes at the RA-SVC junction, reducing SVC-related AF triggers compared to thermal ablation.
Absolute Event Rate: 0.7% vs 4.7%
p-value: p=.03
BACKGROUND: Non-pulmonary vein (non-PV) atrial fibrillation (AF) triggers, including those originating from the superior vena cava (SVC), are an important source of AF initiation beyond the PVs. OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which pulsed field ablation (PFA)-based PV isolation (PVI) modifies atrial arrhythmia inducibility and electrophysiological substrate within the SVC region. METHODS: This prospective observational study evaluated 358 consecutive patients undergoing first-time PVI for AF. A standardized electrophysiological provocation protocol was performed after PVI in all patients. Non-PV AF triggers were defined as premature atrial contractions that directly initiate AF. Arrhythmia inducibility and trigger distribution were compared between PFA and thermal ablation. In a mechanistic sub-study, high-density mapping of the right atrium-SVC (RA-SVC) junction was performed in 40 consecutive patients before and after PFA. RESULTS: Non-PV AF triggers were induced in 7 of 146 patients (4.8%) after PFA and in 22 of 212 (10.4%) after thermal ablation. AF triggers originating from the SVC were significantly less frequent after PFA (1/146, 0.7%) than after thermal ablation (10/212, 4.7%; P = .03). In the mechanistic sub-study, high-density mapping demonstrated conduction delay or block within the RA-SVC region in 33 of 40 patients (83%), with electrical isolation of the SVC observed in 2 patients in whom no intentional SVC ablation was performed. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest an association between PFA and changes in conduction properties at the RA-SVC region, which may influence the distribution of SVC-related AF triggers.
A Sun, study conducted a observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=358). Pulsed field ablation (PFA) vs. Thermal ablation was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation triggers originating from the superior vena cava (p=.03). Pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation resulted in significantly fewer AF triggers originating from the superior vena cava compared to thermal ablation (0.7% vs 4.7%; P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: