Why the study?
Does a smartphone-based application (HRV4Training) accurately capture the relationship between HR/HRV and self-reported training load in athletes?
Does a smartphone-based application (HRV4Training) accurately capture the relationship between HR/HRV and self-reported training load in athletes?
Smartphone-based training monitoring using PPG to measure HR and HRV is feasible and correlates strongly with self-reported training load in free-living settings.
May support smartphone PPG monitoring in athletes; hypothesis-generating pending RCTs on performance outcomes.
We describe an approach to support athletes at various fitness levels in their training load analysis using heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV). A smartphone-based application (HRV4Training) was developed that captures heart activity over one to five minutes using photoplethysmography (PPG) and derives HR and HRV features. HRV4Training integrated a guide for an early morning spot measurement protocol and a questionnaire to capture self-reported training activity. The smartphone application was made publicly available for interested users to quantify training effect. Here we analyze data acquired over a period of 3 weeks to 5 months, including 797 users, breaking down results by gender and age group. Our results suggest a strong relation between HR, HRV and self-reported training load independent of gender and age group. HRV changes due to training were larger than those of HR. We conclude that smartphone-based training monitoring is feasible and a can be used as a practical tool to support large populations outside controlled laboratory environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Altini et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: