Why the study?
In patients undergoing TAVI, it is unclear whether same-day discharge adopting a device-agnostic approach is safe compared to non-same-day discharge.
Does same-day discharge maintain safety compared to non-same-day discharge in patients undergoing elective TAVI?
Does same-day discharge maintain safety compared to non-same-day discharge in patients undergoing elective TAVI?
Same-day discharge after elective TAVI appears to be a safe and feasible approach, including for patients receiving self-expanding valves.
Supports same-day discharge feasibility across valve types; leaves open randomized confirmation in elective TAVI.
Background: In patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), it is unclear whether same-day discharge (SDD) while adopting a device-agnostic approach is a safe strategy compared to non-SDD. We aim to compare TAVI patients who underwent SDD and non-SDD according to a predefined protocol. Methods: This is a prospective single-center study of consecutive patients who were scheduled for elective TAVI procedures. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, vascular access-related complications, any bleeding requiring hospitalization, all stroke (or transient ischemic attack), or new permanent pacemaker implantation at 30 days defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria. Patients who had a self-expanding valve had a comparable primary endpoint to those who had a balloon-expandable valve, including readmission for a permanent pacemaker. Conclusions: SDD TAVI is a safe and feasible approach in patients who underwent an elective uneventful procedure, including patients who received self-expanding valves. Future studies are required to support these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Memon et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: