Why the study?
Although initially linked to desmoplakin and filamin C-related cardiomyopathies, ring-like late gadolinium enhancement has also been reported in nongenetic conditions, creating a need to review its differential diagnoses and mimics.
What are the differential diagnoses and mimics of ring-like late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance?
What are the differential diagnoses and mimics of ring-like late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance?
This review provides a framework for the differential diagnosis of ring-like late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MRI, aiding in the identification of specific genetic and nongenetic cardiomyopathies.
Requires clinical-ECG correlation to avoid misattributing ring-like LGE; leaves open prospective validation of its diagnostic specificity.
Advances in cardiac magnetic resonance have promoted tissue characterization with high spatial and contrast resolution, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences have improved the detection of myocardial fibrosis. The distribution pattern of LGE facilitates differentiation between ischemic and nonischemic etiologies and aids in refining diagnoses within nonischemic cardiomyopathies, suggesting specific etiological factors. A distinctive nonischemic LGE pattern that has recently gained prominence is the ring-like pattern, defined as a subepicardial or mid-wall circumferential or semi-circumferential enhancement, which involves at least three contiguous segments within the same short-axis slice. Initially identified as a diagnostic marker for desmoplakin and filamin C-related cardiomyopathies, the pattern has been reported in nongenetic conditions; nevertheless, it remains an uncommon finding in these diseases. In this article, we aim to present the differential diagnoses of ring-like LGE and its mimics. The combination of epidemiological, clinical, electrocardiographic, and additional features enables a focused refinement of the differential diagnosis associated with ring-like LGE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vaz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: