This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Medical coding is essential for healthcare operations yet remains predominantly manual, error-prone (up to 20%), and costly (up to $18.2 billion annually). Although large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in natural language processing, their application to medical coding has produced limited accuracy. In this study, we evaluated whether fine-tuning LLMs with specialized ICD-10 knowledge can automate code generation across clinical documentation. We adopted a two-phase approach: initial fine-tuning using 74,260 ICD-10 code-description pairs, followed by enhanced training to address linguistic and lexical variations. Evaluations using a proprietary model (GPT-4o mini) on a cloud platform and an open-source model (Llama) on local GPUs demonstrated that initial fine-tuning increased exact matching from <1% to 97%, while enhanced fine-tuning further improved performance in complex scenarios, with real-world clinical notes achieving 69.20% exact match and 87.16% category match. These findings indicate that domain-specific fine-tuned LLMs can reduce manual burdens and improve reliability.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hou et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: