Does a deep learning workflow (DeepStrain) accurately characterize cardiac mechanics from cine-MRI data compared to manual and tagging-MRI reference methods in healthy and CVD subjects?
DeepStrain provides an automated, end-to-end deep learning workflow for accurate strain analysis and characterization of cardiac mechanics from cine-MRI data.
= 150). DL-based volumetric parameters were correlated (>0.98) and without significant bias relative to parameters derived from manual segmentations in 50 healthy and CVD test subjects. Compared to landmarks manually-tracked on tagging-MRI images from 15 healthy subjects, landmark deformation using DL-based motion estimates from paired cine-MRI data resulted in an end-point-error of 2.9 ± 1.5 mm. Measures of end-systolic global strain from these cine-MRI data showed no significant biases relative to a tagging-MRI reference method. On 10 healthy subjects, intraclass correlation coefficient for intra-scanner repeatability was good to excellent (>0.75) for all global measures and most polar map segments. In conclusion, we developed and evaluated the first end-to-end learning-based workflow for automated strain analysis from cine-MRI data to quantitatively characterize cardiac mechanics of healthy and CVD subjects.
Morales et al. (Fri,) studied this question.