The structures of 15 La-Al-Si-O glasses, whose compositions span 11-28 mol% La(2)O(3), 11-30 mol% Al(2)O(3), and 45-78 mol% SiO(2), are explored over both short and intermediate length-scales by using a combination of solid-state (27)Al magic-angle spinning (MAS) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. MAS NMR reveals Al speciations dominated by AlO(4) groups, with minor but significant fractions of AlO(5) (5-10%) and AlO(6) (≲3%) polyhedra present in all La(2)O(3)-Al(2)O(3)-SiO(2) glasses; the amounts of Al([5]) and Al([6]) coordinations increase for decreasing molar fraction of Si. The MD simulations reproduce this compositional trend, with the fractional populations of AlO(p) groups (p = 4, 5, 6) according well with the experimental results. The modeled La speciations mainly involve LaO(6) and LaO(7) polyhedra, giving a range of average La(3+) coordination numbers between 6.0 and 6.6; the latter increases slightly for decreasing Si content of the sample. Besides the expected bridging and non-bridging O species, minor contributions of oxygen triclusters (≤9%) and free O(2-) ions (≤4%) are observed in all MD data. The glass structures exhibit a pronounced Al/Si disorder; the MD simulations reveal essentially random SiO(4)-SiO(4), SiO(4)-AlO(p) and AlO(p)-AlO(q) (p, q = 4, 5, 6) associations, including significant amounts of AlO(4)-AlO(4) contacts, regardless of the n(Al)/n(Si) molar ratio of the glass. The strong violation of Al([4])-Al([4]) avoidance is verified by 2D (27)Al NMR experimentation that correlates double-quantum and single-quantum coherences, here applied for the first time to aluminosilicate glasses, and evidencing AlO(p)-AlO(q) connectivities dominated by AlO(4)-AlO(4) and AlO(4)-AlO(5) pairs. The potential bearings from distinct fictive temperatures of the experimental and modeled glass structures are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaworski et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: