= 0.005 for nonlinearity). Participants who were overweight (HR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.95) and obese (HR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.54-0.96) had a decreased risk of cognitive impairment, while those who were underweight (HR = 1.42; 95% CI 1.21-1.66) had an increased risk. Lower PDI, lower hPDI, and higher uPDI were associated with an increased risk of cognitive impairment (HR = 1.32; 95% CI 1.16-1.50 for PDI; HR = 1.46; 95% CI 1.29-1.66 for hPDI; HR = 1.21; 95% CI 1.06-1.38 for uPDI). The protective effect of being overweight on cognitive impairment was more pronounced among participants with a higher PDI (HR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.57-0.95) than those with a lower PDI (HR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.67-1.12), among participants with a higher hPDI (HR = 0.73; 95% CI 0.57-0.94) than those with a lower hPDI (HR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.72-1.10), and among participants with a lower uPDI (HR = 0.61; 95% CI 0.46-0.80) than those with a higher uPDI (HR = 1.01; 95% CI 0.80-1.27). Our results support the positive associations of overweight status, obesity, an overall PBD, and a healthful PBD with cognitive function in older adults. A lower adherence to an overall PBD, a healthful PBD, and a higher adherence to an unhealthful PBD may attenuate the protective effect of being overweight on cognitive function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: