PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 13, 2006Circulation766 citationsOpen Access

Effect of Posterolateral Scar Tissue on Clinical and Echocardiographic Improvement After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

View Full Paper
GBGabe B. BleekerTKTheodorus A.M. KaandorpHLHildo J. Lamb

Structured PICO

Does the presence of transmural posterolateral scar tissue reduce clinical and echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure?

P
Population
40 consecutive patients with end-stage heart failure (NYHA class III/IV), LVEF ≤35%, QRS duration >120 ms, left bundle-branch block, and chronic coronary artery disease.
I
Intervention
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with transmural (>50% of LV wall thickness) posterolateral scar tissue.
C
Comparator
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients without transmural posterolateral scar tissue.
O
Outcome
Response to CRT (clinical and echocardiographic improvement) at 6-month follow-up.surrogate

The presence of transmural posterolateral scar tissue identified by MRI strongly predicts clinical and echocardiographic nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, one third of patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) do not respond. Nonresponse to CRT may be explained by the presence of scar tissue in the posterolateral left ventricular (LV) segments, which may result in ineffective LV pacing and inadequate LV resynchronization. In the present study, the relationship between transmural posterolateral scar tissue and response to CRT was evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty consecutive patients with end-stage heart failure (NYHA class III/IV), LV ejection fraction 120 ms, left bundle-branch block, and chronic coronary artery disease were included. The localization and transmurality of scar tissue were evaluated with contrast-enhanced MRI. Next, LV dyssynchrony was assessed at baseline and immediately after implantation with tissue Doppler imaging. Clinical parameters, LV volumes, and LV ejection fraction were assessed at baseline and at a 6-month follow-up. Fourteen patients (35%) had a transmural (>50% of LV wall thickness) posterolateral scar. In contrast to patients without posterolateral scar tissue, these patients showed a low response rate (14% versus 81%; P or =65 ms) showed an excellent response rate of 95% compared with patients with a posterolateral scar and/or absent LV dyssynchrony (11%). CONCLUSIONS: CRT does not reduce LV dyssynchrony in patients with transmural scar tissue in the posterolateral LV segments, resulting in clinical and echocardiographic nonresponse to CRT.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bleeker et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a029d91db924cefa9fad1fahttps://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.543678
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper