Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
= 75%, moderate quality of evidence). Trial sequential analysis supported the conclusions of all primary meta-analyses. Results were clinically relevant for pain improvement, but not for maximum mouth opening improvement. Results at long-term follow-up and for other study outcomes were either lacking or too heterogenous for meta-analysis, highlighting the need for more standardized, high-quality research.
Tang et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: