PRGDAI-SD 360+ Decision Architecture is a universal, KPI-governed, evidence-based, and AI-ready meta-architecture for strategic decision-making and governance. It integrates seven decision-quality dimensions: Performance, Risk, Governance, Data, Artificial Intelligence, Sustainability, and Decision Execution. The method is designed to help executives, policymakers, researchers, data leaders, AI strategists, governance boards, and institutional decision-makers convert fragmented KPIs, risk signals, data streams, AI insights, sustainability indicators, and governance inputs into auditable, ethically bounded, and action-oriented decisions. The architecture follows a design science research logic and supports the full decision chain: problem diagnosis → indicator design → data validation → scoring → risk sensing → governance review → decision execution → learning and recalibration. PRGDAI-SD 360+ can be applied across three major application families: 1. Organizational and sectoral governance: airline strategy, airline logistics, MRO, tourism, supply-chain resilience, customer experience, safety, finance, operations, procurement, and sustainability management. 2. Digital and technological governance: data governance, AI governance, cybersecurity, digital resilience, digital transformation, business intelligence, automation, predictive analytics, decision intelligence, and agentic AI-enabled systems. 3. Civilizational and theological governance: civilizational studies, Taqrīb, comparative Kalām, Islamic unity, interreligious dialogue, Christian ecumenism, waqf governance, and sacred-text-to-governance translation. The method consolidates and extends the author’s previous KPI-governed and civilizational frameworks, including IKEF-360+, 7S-360, CAT, TDDM, UCTA, UCTA-PA, GKSF, IHF, ITDF, IDDF, ECKF, TPF-CJ, DDRNIC, and ICRA/MCPI. These prior frameworks function as domain-specific modules, while PRGDAI-SD 360+ provides the universal decision architecture. Its main contribution is not simply performance measurement, but the construction of a 360-degree decision system that links performance intelligence, risk intelligence, governance accountability, data trustworthiness, AI readiness, sustainability impact, and decision execution into one reusable model for evidence-based strategic governance. In sensitive theological and civilizational contexts, the method explicitly treats indicators as decision-support instruments, not as substitutes for theology, ethics, sacred meaning, scholarly judgment, or human dignity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
SeyyedAbdolHojjat MoghadasNian (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: