Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Identifies a senescence gene signature for gastric cancer prognosis, suggesting improved patient stratification.
Cellular senescence plays a context-dependent role in gastric cancer (GC), functioning both through tumor-suppressive arrest and the tumor-promoting senescence-associated secretory phenotype. However, its systematic integration into prognostic models remains limited. Here, we develop a novel interpretable framework to identify and validate a robust senescence-related gene signature for GC prognosis. We first introduce a dual-model interpretable feature selection strategy that integrates a biologically informed Kolmogorov-Arnold Network with a tabular foundation model to identify cancer-associated senescence genes. From the initial candidates, an ensemble of ten machine learning algorithms distills a core 4-gene signature to construct a Senescence Risk Score (SRS). The SRS proves to be a powerful and independent prognostic indicator, effectively stratifies patients into high- and low-risk groups with distinct overall survival across multiple cohorts. High-risk patients exhibit an "immune-hot" but potentially dysfunctional tumor microenvironment, characterized by enriched immune cell infiltration, elevated checkpoint expression, and distinct metabolic reprogramming favoring pathways such as angiogenesis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Furthermore, the SRS correlates with differential somatic mutation profiles and suggests potential sensitivity to specific chemotherapeutic agents. In vitro functional assays confirmed the oncogenic role of SERPINE1, a top-ranked core gene, in promoting GC cell proliferation. Regulatory network analysis revealed potential upstream transcription factors and miRNAs governing the signature. Collectively, we present a validated senescence-related prognostic signature that enables effective risk stratification of patients with gastric cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: