PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 12, 2026Energy Research & Social Science0 citationsOpen Access

When rules fall behind: How outdated regulations stall the energy transition

View Full Paper
IIImad Antoine IbrahimBHBart HomanSSSusanne Skårup

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how outdated legal frameworks impede local energy transitions in various countries.
  • Qualitative, comparative case study across seven communities in Denmark, India, Poland, and the Netherlands
  • Identification of eight main regulatory barriers to local energy initiatives
  • Analysis of how these barriers affect decentralized energy development in practice.
  • Identified barriers include traditional frameworks limiting decentralized initiatives and variance in EU law implementation.
  • Regulatory ambiguity and administrative burdens hinder local energy project development.
  • Proposed the need for adaptive legal frameworks to support decentralized energy initiatives and enhance community engagement.

Abstract

Local energy transitions are promoted as means to achieve decarbonization, ensure democratic participation by local communities in energy decision-making, and foster social acceptance of renewable energy projects. However, despite the growing maturity of energy technologies and increased policy support, local energy initiatives continue to face regulatory barriers that limit their capacity to achieve their goals. The article examines how legal frameworks stall local energy transitions across seven communities in Denmark, India, Poland, and the Netherlands. It identifies eight main regulatory barriers and examines how they operate in practice through a qualitative, comparative case study approach. These are: 1) traditional regulatory frameworks limit decentralized energy initiatives; 2) national implementation of EU energy law as a supranational legal order differs between nations, creating uneven conditions for local energy initiatives; 3) laws and regulations lag behind technological development in decentralized energy systems; 4) local and remote energy communities have limited access to regulatory decision-making; 5) regulatory ambiguity and policy uncertainty discourage local and community energy investment; 6) complex and burdensome administrative procedures slow local energy project development; 7) limited standardization and interoperability hinder renewable energy deployment and 8) restrictive rules limit energy sharing and peer-to-peer exchange among communities. The obstacles overlap and reinforce one another, shaping the pace, direction, and scope of local energy initiatives. The findings show how these regulatory barriers are experienced in practice across different contexts, legal systems, and institutions. They also highlight the need for more adaptive, participatory, and interoperable regulatory frameworks that can accommodate decentralized energy initiatives.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ibrahim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a02c2fdce8c8c81e964048bhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104749
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper