This article reorients social medicine in light of historical struggles in Latin America, suggesting broader insights for global health and medical education.
Current debates in social medicine and global health have emphasized the medical curriculum as a means to foster awareness, reflexivity, and sensitivity among medical students and practitioners. Yet, this curricular focus may come at a cost, risking a narrowing of the scope of social medicine by neglecting broader historical, political, and ideological forces. This article argues for a reorientation that situates contemporary social medicine within longer histories of geopolitical struggle, using Latin American social medicine (LASM) since the mid-twentieth century as a critical lens. LASM illustrates how political regimes, international institutions, and social movements have influenced medical training, the scalability of health initiatives, and community-engaged activism. By integrating historical, ideological, and political analysis, this perspective positions LASM not merely as a regional case study but as a site of theoretical production, offering insights for social medicine, global health, and decolonial approaches to training, infrastructure, and activism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abarca-Brown et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: