Key result
Ivabradine shows no effect on LVEF versus placebo in patients receiving anthracycline therapy.
Why the study?
Ivabradine may offer cardioprotection in cancer patients by reducing heart rate without negative inotropy, but its efficacy in anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity remains unclear.
Does ivabradine prevent anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity and improve LVEF in adult patients receiving anthracycline therapy?
Meta-Analysis (n=210)
Does ivabradine prevent anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity and improve LVEF in adult patients receiving anthracycline therapy?
Effect estimate: MD 0.32% (95% CI -0.90 to 1.54)
p-value: p=0.61
Current evidence from a small meta-analysis does not support a definitive cardioprotective role for ivabradine in preventing anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity.
Ivabradine does not preserve LVEF in anthracycline recipients; leaves open whether heart-rate reduction confers meaningful cardio-protection.
PURPOSE: Anthracyclines are widely used anticancer agents but are limited by dose-dependent cardiotoxicity. Ivabradine selectively reduces heart rate without negative inotropy and may offer cardio protection in cancer patients, though its efficacy in anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity (AIC) remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ivabradine versus placebo in adult patients receiving anthracycline therapy. PubMed, Cochrane Central, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists were searched through August 2025. Outcomes included left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), heart rate, blood pressure, NT-proBNP, and strain-based parameters. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. RESULTS: Three RCTs (n = 210) met inclusion criteria. Ivabradine showed no significant effect on LVEF (MD 0.32%, 95% CI - 0.90 to 1.54; p = 0.61) or NT-proBNP. Heart rate reduction was directionally favorable but not statistically significant (MD - 4.11 bpm, 95% CI - 8.69 to 0.46; p = 0.08). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were unchanged. Strain-based outcomes were inconsistently reported, precluding pooled analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Given the limited sample size, heterogeneity, and variability in endpoint definitions, current evidence is insufficient to establish a definitive cardioprotective role for ivabradine in AIC. Larger, rigorously designed trials with standardized imaging and biomarker endpoints are needed to determine its role.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Umar et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity (n=210). Ivabradine vs. Placebo was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD 0.32%, 95% CI -0.90 to 1.54, p=0.61). Ivabradine showed no significant effect on left ventricular ejection fraction compared with placebo (MD 0.32%, p=0.61) in adult patients receiving anthracycline therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: