Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved accuracy in weed classification, suggesting better agricultural practices.
Accurate and efficient weed identification is essential for precision agriculture, yet existing deep learning approaches struggle to balance classification accuracy with computational efficiency required for real-time field deployment. Fine-grained weed classification presents unique challenges due to subtle inter-species morphological differences and significant intra-class variations caused by diverse growth stages and environmental conditions. In this paper, we propose a unified RepVGG model factory with plug-in Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) attention and Generalized Mean (GeM) pooling for fine-grained agricultural classification. Our approach leverages the structural re-parameterization technique of RepVGG to achieve efficient inference while enhancing discriminative feature learning through channel-wise attention recalibration and adaptive feature aggregation. The SE attention module explicitly models inter-channel dependencies to emphasize informative features, while the learnable GeM pooling enables adaptive interpolation between average and max pooling behaviors for optimal feature aggregation. We further develop a unified model construction interface that supports systematic benchmarking across multiple deep learning backends with consistent experimental protocols. Comprehensive experiments on the CottonWeedID15 dataset demonstrate that our proposed RepVGG-B1 + SE + GeM model achieves state-of-the-art performance with a testing F1-score of 99.5%, outperforming 27 baseline architectures including ResNet101 (99.1%), DenseNet161 (98.9%), and EfficientNet variants. Notably, our model maintains superior inference efficiency at 188.7 ms, which is 8.8% faster than ResNet101 while achieving 0.4% higher accuracy. Ablation studies confirm that SE attention consistently improves accuracy by 0.3% across different RepVGG backbones with minimal parameter overhead (2–3%), while GeM pooling provides complementary gains of 0.1–0.2%. The proposed unified framework offers a flexible and modular solution for deploying high-performance weed identification systems in resource-constrained agricultural environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: