Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates that atomic attraction redefines gravity in the universe, suggesting a new perspective on physics.
Background: Traditional physics defines gravity as a fundamental force dependent on mass and space-time curvature. This research, based on the Sarahu Atomic Biology (SAB) framework, challenges this definition, asserting that gravity is not an independent force but a secondary result of Atomic Attraction. Methods: Utilizing 25 years of longitudinal observation and data from the Sarahunaath Matha, this study analyzes the behavior of matter in varied environments, including "upward-flowing" water anomalies and lunar motion. The methodology focuses on the 360-Degree Atomic Vector to explain why objects move in specific directions based on subatomic frequency rather than just downward mass-pull. Results: The research identifies that what is termed "Gravity" is actually a collective organizational pull generated by atoms to maintain systemic integrity. The study introduces the Atomic Attraction Force (Aaf) formula, which incorporates Atomic Rhythm (Ωrhythm) and Dimensional Constants (Ddim). The COVID-19 observational data and lunar analysis further prove that stability is maintained through rhythmic synchronization. Conclusion: Gravity is a scientific Mithoka (illusion). The universe is held together by an interconnected web of atomic pull. Without atoms, there is no pull; therefore, the atom is the primary source of all universal forces. This paper provides a new foundation for understanding planetary motion, flight, and the 360-degree structural reality of the cosmos. Keywords · Atomic Attraction Force (Aaf) · 360-Degree Atomic Vector · Atomic Rhythm (Ωrhythm) · The Gravity Mithoka · Dimensional Constant (Ddim) · Organizational Pull · Sarahu Atomic Biology (SAB) · Lunar Atomic Dimension
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarahu Nagarazan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: