Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
When people use generic masculine language instead of more gender-inclusive forms, they communicate gender stereotypes and sometimes exclusion of women from certain social roles. Past research related gender-inclusive language use to sexist beliefs and attitudes. Given that this aspect of language use may be transparent to users, it is unclear whether people explicitly act on these beliefs when using gender-exclusive language forms or whether these are more implicit, habitual patterns. In two studies with German-speaking participants, we showed that spontaneous use of gender-inclusive personal nouns is guided by explicitly favorable intentions as well as habitual processes involving past use of such language. Further indicating the joint influence of deliberate and habitual processes, Study 2 revealed that language-use intentions are embedded in explicit sexist ideologies. As anticipated in our decision-making model, the effects of sexist beliefs on language emerged through deliberate mechanisms involving attitudes and intentions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sabine Sczesny
University of Bern
Franziska Zellweger
Zurich University of Teacher Education
Wendy Wood
Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
University of Southern California
University of Bern
FHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sczesny et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a02cd27a59fd503299e2108 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215585727
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: