Why the study?
Low-dose long-term colchicine for secondary prevention in established ASCVD has been studied in multiple randomized trials, prompting this meta-analysis to evaluate its efficacy and safety.
Does long-term low-dose colchicine reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with established ASCVD?
Does long-term low-dose colchicine reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with established ASCVD?
In a meta-analysis of 10 RCTs, long-term low-dose colchicine added to standard therapy significantly reduced MACE in patients with established ASCVD without increasing serious adverse events.
Supports colchicine addition in established ASCVD; confirms MACE reduction across 10 RCTs.
AIMS: Inflammation is a main pathophysiological driver in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). Low-dose long-term colchicine for secondary prevention in patients with established ASCVD has been studied in multiple randomized trials in the last decade.This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term low-dose colchicine for secondary prevention in patients with established ASCVD. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines to evaluate studies reporting long-term outcomes in patients with ASCVD. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus databases for relevant studies up to 1 December 2024. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death (CVD), myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RRs). RESULTS: Ten randomized clinical trials enrolling 22 532 patients were identified. Addition of colchicine to standard medical treatment in patients with established ASCVD reduced the risk for MACE by 27% [RR 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-0.95], with a number needed to treat of 52. Colchicine was found to significantly reduce the risk of MI (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.96) and coronary revascularization (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.94). There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality, risk of serious gastrointestinal events, infections requiring hospitalization and cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of long-term low-dose colchicine for secondary prevention of MACE in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ballacci et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: