Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Self-similarity in general relativity is briefly reviewed and the differences between selfsimilarity of the first kind (which can be obtained from dimensional considerations and is invariantly characterized by the existence of a homothetic vector in perfect fluid spacetimes) and generalized selfsimilarity are discussed. The covariant notion of a kinematic self-similarity in the context of relativistic fluid mechanics is defined. It has been argued that kinematic self-similarity is an appropriate generalization of homothety and is the natural relativistic counterpart of self-similarity of the more general second (and zeroth) kind. Various mathematical and physical properties of spacetimes admitting a kinematic self-similarity are discussed. The governing equations for perfect fluid cosmological models are introduced and a set of integrability conditions for the existence of a proper kinematic self-similarity in these models is derived. Exact solutions of the irrotational perfect fluid Einstein field equations admitting a kinematic self-similarity are then sought in a number of special cases, and it is found that; (1) in the geodesic case the 3-spaces orthogonal to the fluid velocity vector are necessarily Ricci-flat and (ii) in the further specialisation to dust (i.e., zero pressure) the differential equation governing the expansion can be completely integrated and the asymptotic properties of these solutions can be determined, (iii) the solutions in the case of zero-expansion consist of a class of shear-free and static models and a class
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A. A. Coley (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: