Why the study?
Does red blood cell-containing perfusate prevent tissue hypoxia compared to cell-free buffer perfusate in isolated perfused guinea pig hearts?
Does red blood cell-containing perfusate prevent tissue hypoxia compared to cell-free buffer perfusate in isolated perfused guinea pig hearts?
Standard buffer-perfused Langendorff heart preparations may be inadequately oxygenated, and the addition of red blood cells (5% hematocrit) is necessary to prevent tissue hypoxia.
Standard buffer-perfused isolated hearts may harbor tissue hypoxia; animal data leaves open whether RBC supplementation is required in Langendorff models.
An anatomically realistic model for oxygen transport in cardiac tissue is introduced for analyzing data measured from isolated perfused guinea pig hearts. The model is constructed to match the microvascular anatomy of cardiac tissue based on available morphometric data. Transport in the three-dimensional system (divided into distinct microvascular, interstitial, and parenchymal spaces) is simulated. The model is used to interpret experimental data on mean cardiac tissue myoglobin saturation and to reveal differences in tissue oxygenation between buffer-perfused and red blood cell-perfused isolated hearts. Interpretation of measured mean myoglobin saturation is strongly dependent on the oxygen content of the perfusate (e.g., red blood cell-containing vs. cell-free perfusate). Model calculations match experimental values of mean tissue myoglobin saturation, measured mean myoglobin, and venous oxygen tension and can be used to predict distributions of intracellular oxygen tension. Calculations reveal that approximately 20% of the tissue is hypoxic with an oxygen tension of <0.5 mmHg when the buffer is equilibrated with 95% oxygen to give an arterial oxygen tension of over 600 mmHg. The addition of red blood cells to give a hematocrit of only 5% prevents tissue hypoxia. It is incorrect to assume that the usual buffer-perfused Langendorff heart preparation is adequately oxygenated for flows in the range of < or =10 ml. min-1. ml tissue-1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beard et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: