Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals a bias favoring resuscitation of children with preexisting disabilities over previously healthy children among medical students, highlighting ethical challenges in medical training.
This study examined whether biases concerning age and/or disability status influenced resuscitation decisions. Medical students were randomly chosen to read 1 of 4 vignettes, organized in a 2 (age: infant vs school-age) × 2 (disability: preexisting vs no preexisting) between-subjects design. The vignettes described a pediatric patient experiencing an acute episode who required resuscitation. Following resuscitation, patients with existing disability would continue to have disability, whereas those without would develop disability. Participants indicated whether they would resuscitate, given a 10% chance of success. There was a significant main effect of disability: Medical students displayed a preference for resuscitating previously disabled children compared with previously healthy children when prognosis was held constant, F(1, 121) = 4.89, p = .03. This differential treatment of the two groups cannot easily be morally justified and poses a quandary for educators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhong et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: