This paper presents a new empirical regularity between the volatility of productivity growth and long-run unemployment for a given level of long-run productivity growth. A theoretical framework based on asymmetric real wage rigidities is shown to have the potential to rationalize this finding. The model tends to fit U.S. long-run unemployment better than a specification based on long-run productivity growth only, especially during the Great Moderation and the Great Recession.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benigno et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: