Why the study?
Do femoral or brachial artery pressures more reliably reproduce central aortic pressures immediately following cardiopulmonary bypass in adults?
Do femoral or brachial artery pressures more reliably reproduce central aortic pressures immediately following cardiopulmonary bypass in adults?
Femoral artery pressure monitoring is more reliable than brachial artery monitoring for reflecting central aortic pressure immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass.
Brachial monitoring may underestimate central MAP more often than femoral immediately post-bypass; hypothesis-generating for monitoring site selection in cardiac surgery.
Following recent evidence that brachial and femoral artery pressures are more reliable than radial artery pressures after cardiopulmonary bypass, thirty-one adults had simultaneous pre- and post-bypass measurements of brachial, femoral, and ascending aortic pressures. Two minutes after cardiopulmonary bypass, brachial artery systolic pressure and mean arterial pressure fell significantly below corresponding pressures in the femoral artery and aorta. Five minutes after cardiopulmonary bypass, only brachial artery systolic pressure was still less than femoral and aortic systolic pressures. By ten minutes after bypass, all significant pressure differences had resolved except between brachial and femoral artery systolic pressures. Clinically significant (greater than or equal to 5 mmHg) aortic-to-brachial reductions in mean arterial pressures occurred in six (19%) patients at two minutes and in three (10%) patients at five and ten minutes after bypass. Equivalent aortic-to-femoral mean pressure diminution occurred in two (6%) patients at two minutes and one (3%) patient at five and ten minutes after bypass. Neither systemic vascular resistance nor body temperatures contributed significantly to post-bypass central-to-peripheral pressure reductions. Immediately following bypass, femoral artery pressures reproduce central aortic pressures more reliably than do radial or brachial artery pressures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gravlee et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: