Why the study?
Does melatonin reduce myocardial infarct size or alter hemodynamics in a rabbit model of ischemia-reperfusion?
Does melatonin reduce myocardial infarct size or alter hemodynamics in a rabbit model of ischemia-reperfusion?
Melatonin appears safe but does not reduce myocardial infarct size or alter hemodynamics in a rabbit model of ischemia-reperfusion.
No infarct size reduction with melatonin in this rabbit model; leaves open further preclinical testing before any clinical consideration.
BACKGROUND: Melatonin, a hormone, has gained popularity and is being used by millions for a variety of indications. There are few data on its safety or its effects on hemodynamics and coronary blood flow. Also, studies have confirmed that melatonin is a potent antioxidant. Therefore, it may be capable of scavenging free radicals during the reperfusion phase after a heart attack. This study evaluates the safety of melatonin with regard to its cardiovascular effects and tests the hypothesis that melatonin might be protective in the setting of ischemia-reperfusion and reduce myocardial infarct size. METHODS AND RESULTS: Anesthetized rabbits were treated with melatonin (n = 8, 10 mg/kg, intravenously) 10 minutes before coronary artery occlusion (CAO) and again 15 minutes before reperfusion. Control rabbits received vehicle (n = 8). All rabbits underwent 30 minutes of occlusion and 3 hour reperfusion. Both before and during CAO, melatonin did not alter heart rate compared with control (185 +/- 7 beats/min v 181 +/- 7 before; and 179 +/- 5 v 181 +/- 9 during, respectively, P = NS) or blood pressure (70 +/- 4 mmHg v 66 +/- 6 before and 59 +/- 4 v 58 +/- 5 during, respectively, P = NS). Regional myocardial blood flow (RMBF) was similar before CAO in the melatonin group (1.18 +/- 0.17 mL/min/g) versus the control group (1.15 +/- 0.10 mL/min/g). Infarct size, expressed as a fraction of ischemic risk zone, was similar in the melatonin (0.29 +/- 0.03) and control groups (0.29 +/- 0.06, P = NS). At a higher dose of 50 mg/kg in treated (n = 7) versus control (n = 7) rabbits, melatonin treatment did not alter heart rate (204 +/- 14 in melatonin group v 181 +/- 5 in controls, P = NS) or blood pressure (80 +/- 11 in melatonin v 66 +/- 7 in controls, P = NS) when compared with control. Melatonin at this dose also did not affect infarct size, 0.38 +/- 0.06, when compared with control, 0.34 +/- 0.07, P = NS. CONCLUSION: Melatonin's effects on hemodynamics and coronary blood flow were neutral, and it did not exacerbate myocardial ischemia or necrosis in this model. Melatonin appears to be a safe drug with no apparent effects on the cardiovascular system in this model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dave et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: