Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: ) may be an innovative treatment for symptoms of knee osteoarthritis (OA) due to possible shared pathological mechanisms between diminished parasympathetic function, central pain mechanisms, and knee pain. Thus, we sought to test the safety and preliminary efficacy of tVNS in people with knee OA. Design: ). We examined the extent to which these outcome measures changed after tVNS using linear mixed models. Results: 30 participants with knee OA were included, and all completed the intervention without any major side effects. Compared to baseline, knee pain was reduced by 1.27 (95 % CI, -1.74, -0.80) immediately after and by 1.87 (-2.33, -1.40) 15 min after tVNS; CPM improved by 0.11 (0.04, 0.19) and 0.07 (-0.01, 0.15); and HF improved by 213.29 (-0.38, 426.96) and 234.17 (20.49, 447.84). PPT and TS were not changed after tVNS. Conclusions: Our preliminary data demonstrated that tVNS may be a safe pain-relieving treatment for people with knee OA. Our findings suggest that improvement of knee pain might be derived from improvement of parasympathetic function and central pain mechanisms as no local therapy was applied. A large study is needed to confirm that tVNS is a novel intervention to ameliorate knee pain in people with knee OA. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05625178).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aoyagi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: