Feline lymphocytic cholangitis is a poorly characterized disease complex with respect to histologic lesions, immunophenotype, and etiopathogenesis. Seventy-eight cases of feline lymphocytic cholangitis (n = 51) and feline hepatic lymphoma (n = 27) were reviewed using standardized histopathology, immunophenotyping (B cell and T cell), polymerase chain reaction for T-cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangement, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for eubacteria. Five histopathologic features in cases of lymphocytic cholangitis assisted in its differentiation from hepatic lymphoma: bile duct targeting (n = 32, 62.7%), ductopenia (n = 9, 17.6%), peribiliary fibrosis (n = 37, 72.5%), portal B-cell aggregates (n = 36, 70.6%), and portal lipogranulomas (n = 38, 74.5%). The majority of lymphocytic cholangitis cases (n = 35, 68.6%) were T cell predominant; 15 (29.4%) had an equal mix of B cells and T cells, and 1 (1.9%) had a B cell-predominant infiltrate; 66.6% of hepatic lymphoma cases were T-cell lymphomas. TCR clonality results were unexpected, with 17.1% of cases of lymphocytic cholangitis having clonal or oligoclonal populations and with T-cell lymphomas having variable TCR clonality (63.6% clonal or oligoclonal, 36.3% polyclonal). The majority of lymphocytic cholangitis (n = 32 of 36, 88.8%) and all hepatic lymphoma cases had no detectable eubacteria using FISH. As demonstrated here, bile duct targeting, ductopenia, peribiliary fibrosis, portal B-cell aggregates, and portal lipogranulomas are lymphocytic cholangitis features that, along with polyclonal TCR (83%), help differentiate it from hepatic lymphoma. No strong evidence was found implicating in situ bacterial colonization as an etiopathogenesis of lymphocytic cholangitis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Warren et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: