, during and after 3D printing, in order to obtain a stable 3D core/shell structure and high cell viability. The whole process was carried out under conditions (neutral pH and a temperature between room temperature and 37 °C) that were gentle to the cells, so the cells incorporated into the shell remained alive throughout the 3D scaffold for the entire culture period (35 days). The core/shell structured scaffold significantly enhanced the mechanical properties when compared with a hydrogel that uses a typical cell-printing process or with a ceramic scaffold, due to the co-operative effect of each material. The compressive strength of the CDHA/alginate scaffolds in the wet state was 3.2 MPa, whereas the compressive strength of alginate could not be determined in the wet state. The 3D structural morphology of CDHA/alginate scaffolds was well retained, even after a compression test, and showed less deformation because the CDHA ceramic-core was encapsulated within the elastic alginate. The process developed in this study suggests a new cell printing model that has excellent potential for application in the field of bone tissue regeneration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raja et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: